Corporate social responsibility and workers: balancing practices analysis between work and family

Responsabilidade social corporativa e trabalhadores: análise de práticas de equilíbrio entre trabalho e família

Nágila Giovanna Silva Vilela, Ronaldo de Oliveira Santos Jhunior, Mariane Lemos Lourenço

Resumo


The objective of this article is to analyze Corporate Social Responsibility practices that contribute to the balance between work and family from the perspective of working women in the industrial sector. Such practices in this paper include flexibility in working hours, part-time work, home office, extended licenses, and managerial and social support. Qualitative and descriptive research included field research and interviewed fifteen women workers from three major Brazilian industries and documentary research. Data analysis was done through content analysis. Based on the research findings, it was noticed that Corporate Social Responsibility practices directed at the family of workers are not enough for them to balance their lives between work and family, a result that deserves consideration by employees and employers.


Palavras-chave


Corporate Social Responsibility; Work and Family; Balancing Practices

Texto completo:

PDF HTML

Referências


ACHOUR, M.; KHALIL, S. B.; AHMAD, B. B.; NOR, M. R.; YUSOFF, M. B. M. Management and supervisory support as a moderator of work–family demands and women’s well-being. Humanomics, 2017.

BAUMAN, C. W.; SKITKA, L. J. Corporate social responsibility as a source of employee satisfaction. Research in Organizational Behavior, v. 32, p. 63-86, 2012.

BRASIL. Constituição (1998). Constituição: República Federativa do Brasil. Brasília, DF: Senado Federal, 1988.

BRASIL. Lei n. 8.861, de 25 de março de 1994. Dá nova redação aos arts. 387 e 392 da Consolidação das Leis do Trabalho (CLT), altera os arts. 12 e 25 da Lei nº 8.212, de 24 julho de 1991, e os arts 39, 71, 73 e 106 da Lei nº 8.213, de 24 julho de 1991, todos pertinentes à licença-maternidade. 1994. Available in: . Access in: 04 dec. 2018.

BROUGH, P.; PEARS, J. Evaluating the influence of the type of social support on job satisfaction and work related psychological well-being. International Journal of Organisational Behaviour, v. 8, n. 2, p. 472-485, 2004.

CAMPBELL, J. T.; EDEN, L.; MILLER, S. R. Multinationals and corporate social responsibility in host countries: Does distance matter?. Journal of International Business Studies, v. 43, n. 1, p. 84-106, 2012.

CARROLL, A. B. A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. Academy of management review, v. 4, n. 4, p. 497-505, 1979.

CARROLL, A. B.; SHABANA, K. M. The business case for corporate social responsibility: A review of concepts, research and practice. International journal of management reviews, v. 12, n. 1, p. 85-105, 2010.

CHAMBEL, M. J.; CARVALHO, V. S.; CESÁRIO, F.; LOPES, S. The work-to-life conflict mediation between job characteristics and well-being at work. Career Development International, 2017.

Confederação Nacional da Indústria. A Importância da Indústria no Brasil. 2017. Available in: . Access in: 12 sep. 2017.

COOKLIN, A. R.; WESTRUPP, E. M.; STRAZDINS, L.; GIALLO, R.; MARTIN, A.; NICHOLSON, J. M. Fathers at work: work–family conflict, work–family enrichment and parenting in an Australian cohort. Journal of Family Issues, v. 37, n. 11, p. 1611-1635, 2016.

DONALDSON, T.; PRESTON, L. E. The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of management Review, v. 20, n. 1, p. 65-91, 1995.

FARIA, G. S.; RACHID, A. Gestão de pessoas em tempos de flexibilização do trabalho. Revista de Ciências Gerenciais, v. 10, n. 12, p. 86-95, 2015.

FREEMAN, R. Edward. Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Cambridge university press, 2010.

HAGQVIST, E.; GÅDIN, K. G.; NORDENMARK, Mikael. Work–family conflict and well-being across Europe: The role of gender context. Social Indicators Research, v. 132, n. 2, p. 785-797, 2017.

HILL, E. J.; GRZYWACZ, J. G.; ALLEN, S.; BLANCHARD, V. L.; MATZ-COSTA, C., SHULKIN, S.; PITT-CATSOUPHES, M. Defining and conceptualizing workplace flexibility. Community, Work and Family, v. 11, n. 2, p. 149-163, 2008.

KIM, H. L.; RHOU, Y.; UYSAL, M.; KWON, N. An examination of the links between corporate social responsibility (CSR) and its internal consequences. International Journal of Hospitality Management, v. 61, p. 26-34, 2017.

LEWIS, J.; CAMPBELL, M.; HUERTA, C. Patterns of paid and unpaid work in Western Europe: gender, commodification, preferences and the implications for policy. Journal of European social policy, v. 18, n. 1, p. 21-37, 2008.

MANSOUR, S.; TREMBLAY, D-G. Workload, generic and work–family specific social supports and job stress. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 2016.

MCWILLIAMS, A.; SIEGEL, D. S.; WRIGHT, P. M. Corporate social responsibility: Strategic implications. Journal of management studies, v. 43, n. 1, p. 1-18, 2006.

METZNER, R. J.; FISCHER, F. M.; NOGUEIRA, D. P. Responsabilidade social empresarial e trabalhadores. Revista Brasileira de Medicina do Trabalho, v. 3, n. 2, p. 138-147, 2005.

MUNSCH, C. L. Flexible work, flexible penalties: The effect of gender, childcare, and type of request on the flexibility bias. Social Forces, v. 94, n. 4, p. 1567-1591, 2016.

ÖUN, I. Work-family conflict in the Nordic countries: A comparative analysis. Journal of comparative family studies, v. 43, n. 2, p. 165-184, 2012.

PINTO, A. M. G. As diferenças de género na percepção do conflito trabalho-família. 2000. Tese de Doutorado.

ROSA, R.; LORGA, C.; LYONETTE, C. Marriage and gender inequality: work–family arrangements of Portuguese and British highly qualified women. Community, Work & Family, v. 19, n. 4, p. 414-437, 2016.

RUPPANNER, L. Conflict between work and family: An investigation of four policy measures. Social Indicators Research, v. 110, n. 1, p. 327-347, 2013.

RUSSO, A.; PERRINI, F. Investigating stakeholder theory and social capital: CSR in large firms and SMEs. Journal of Business ethics, v. 91, n. 2, p. 207-221, 2010.

SCHWAB, K. Davos Manifesto 2020: The Universal Purpose of a Company in the Fourth Industrial Revolution. World Economic Forum. 2020. Available in: . Access in: 04 feb. 2020.

SEIERSTAD, C.; KIRTON, G. Having it all? Women in high commitment careers and work–life balance in Norway. Gender, Work & Organization, v. 22, n. 4, p. 390-404, 2015.

SEVÄ, I. J.; ÖUN, I. Self‐employment as a strategy for dealing with the competing demands of work and family? The importance of family/lifestyle motives. Gender, Work & Organization, v. 22, n. 3, p. 256-272, 2015.

SHETH, H.; BABIAK, K. M. Beyond the game: Perceptions and practices of corporate social responsibility in the professional sport industry. Journal of Business Ethics, v. 91, n. 3, p. 433-450, 2010.

SOUZA, M. A.; DE SOUZA, L. A. V. A Responsabilidade Social Corporativa no Brasil e na Argentina: um estudo a partir da Teoria das Representações Sociais. Revista Capital Científico-Eletrônica (RCCe) v. 10, n. 2, p. 110-126, 2012.




Direitos autorais 2020 Nágila Giovanna Silva Vilela, Ronaldo de Oliveira Santos Jhunior, Mariane Lemos Lourenço

Revista Capital Científico – Eletrônica (RCCe) Rua: Padre Salvador, 875 – Bairro Santa Cruz CEP: 85015-430  Guarapuava-Paraná-Brasil Campus Santa Cruz – Editora UNICENTRO ISSN  2177-4153 (Online)

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.