Aplicação da técnica de vinheta em estudos sobre processos decisórios

Application of the vignette technique in studies on decision-making processes

Ana Luiza Monteiro Bastos Ornellas, David Chester Carvalho Barros, Cleber Carvalho de Castro, Uajará Pessoa Araújo

Resumo


Uma das técnicas para levantar dados sobre o fenômeno dos julgamentos humanos é a vinheta que seria a criação de cenários hipotéticos. O presente trabalho tem o objetivo de realizar uma revisão integrativa a fim de identificar como a técnica de vinheta vem sendo aplicada nos estudos sobre processos decisórios organizacionais. Nesse sentido, realizou-se um levantamento bibliográfico dos últimos 5 anos via Scopus. Ao todo 17 estudos foram identificados por aplicarem a técnica no contexto da tomada de decisão. Os resultados apontam que técnica vem sendo aplicada nos estudos sobre processos decisórios organizacionais, principalmente, nas decisões relacionadas à cadeia de suprimentos e com forte presença de testes estatísticos e controles adicionais para verificar a validade interna e externa, bem como, a presença de vieses. A principal contribuição é indicar caminhos para o desenvolvimento de novos estudos que apliquem técnicas menos convencionais.


Palavras-chave


Decisão; Vinheta; Revisão Integrativa

Texto completo:

PDF HTML

Referências


AGUINIS, Herman; BRADLEY, Kyle J. Best practice recommendations for designing and implementing experimental vignette methodology studies. Organizational research methods, v. 17, n. 4, p. 351-371, 2014.

ALEXANDER, Cheryl S.; BECKER, Henry Jay. The use of vignettes in survey research. Public opinion quarterly, v. 42, n. 1, p. 93-104, 1978.

AMOS, Clinton et al. Blinded by the light? Analyzing sustainability authenticity, customer service perceptions, and halo effects. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 2018.

ARIELY, Dan; JONES, Simon. Predictably irrational. New York: HarperCollins, 2008.

BARDLN, Lawrence. Análise de conteúdo. Lisboa: edições, v. 70, p. 225, 1977.

BAZERMAN, Charles. Volosinov, Bakhtin, literary theory, and literacy studies. Bakhtinian perspectives on language, literacy, and learning, p. 53-65, 2004.

BELHADI, Amine et al. Behavioral mechanisms influencing sustainable supply chain governance decision-making from a dyadic buyer-supplier perspective. International Journal of Production Economics, v. 236, p. 108136, 2021.

BLAJER-GOŁĘBIEWSKA, Anna. Individual corporate reputation and perception of collective corporate reputation regarding stock market investments. Plos one, v. 16, n. 9, p. e0257323, 2021.

BODE, Christiane; ROGAN, Michelle; SINGH, Jasjit. Up to No Good? Gender, Social Impact Work, and Employee Promotions. Administrative Science Quarterly, v. 67, n. 1, p. 82-130, 2022.

BOTELHO, Louise Lira Roedel; DE ALMEIDA CUNHA, Cristiano Castro; MACEDO, Marcelo. O método da revisão integrativa nos estudos organizacionais. Gestão e sociedade, v. 5, n. 11, p. 121-136, 2011.

CHAE, Sangho et al. To insource or outsource the sourcing? A behavioral investigation of the multi-tier sourcing decision. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 2019.

COZBY, P. (2003). Métodos de pesquisa em ciências do comportamento. São Paulo: Atlas.

DE CAMPOS SERRA, Bernardo Paraiso; TOMEI, Patrícia Amélia; SERRA, Fernando António Ribeiro. A pesquisa em tomada de decisão estratégica no alto escalão: evolução e base intelectual do tema. Revista de Ciências da Administração, v. 16, n. 40, p. 11-28, 2014.

EVANS, Spencer C. et al. Vignette methodologies for studying clinicians’ decision-making: validity, utility, and application in ICD-11 field studies. International journal of clinical and health psychology, v. 15, n. 2, p. 160-170, 2015.

FINCH, Janet; MASON, Jennifer. Obligations of kinship in contemporary Britain: is there normative agreement?. British Journal of Sociology, p. 345-367, 1991.

FINGER, Michael S.; RAND, Kevin L. Addressing validity concerns in clinical psychology research. Handbook of research methods in clinical psychology, p. 13-30, 2003.

FOERSTL, Kai; FRANKE, Henrik; CATALDO, Zelal. What drives managers to insource production? Evidence from a behavioural experiment. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, v. 27, n. 4, p. 100715, 2021.

FRANCESCHINI, Ana Carolina Trousdell; FERREIRA, Diogo Conque Seco. Economia comportamental: Uma introdução para analistas do comportamento. Revista Interamericana de Psicología/Interamerican Journal of Psychology, v. 46, n. 2, p. 317-325, 2012.

FRANKE, Henrik; FOERSTL, Kai; HEESE, H. Sebastian. The interaction effect of goal misalignment and metaknowledge distribution on team decision making in operations and supply chain management. Decision Sciences, v. 52, n. 2, p. 331-361, 2021.

HSU, Yu‐Lin; REID, Gavin C. Two‐stage decision‐making within the firm: Analysis and case studies. Managerial and Decision Economics, v. 42, n. 6, p. 1355-1373, 2021.

KAHNEMAN, Daniel. Maps of bounded rationality: Psychology for behavioral economics. American economic review, v. 93, n. 5, p. 1449-1475, 2003.

KAHNEMAN, Daniel. Reference points, anchors, norms, and mixed feelings. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, v. 51, n. 2, p. 296-312, 1992.

KAHNEMAN, Daniel; SIBONY, Olivier; SUNSTEIN, C. R. Noise. HarperCollins UK, 2022.

KAHNEMAN, Daniel. Thinking, fast and slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New York (2011)

KAHNEMAN, Daniel; TVERSKY, Amos. Choices, values, and frames. American Psychologist, v. 39, n. 4, p. 341-350, 1984.

KAHNEMAN, Daniel.; TVERSKY, Amos. Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, nº 47, 263-291, 1979.

KAMPHUIS, Pascal; GLEBBEEK, Arie C. Job (in) security and workers' training decisions: A framing approach. International Journal for Research in Vocational Education and Training (IJRVET), v. 7, n. 3, p. 361-387, 2020.

KIRSCHBAUM, Charles; HOELZ, José Carlos. A confiança em situações ambivalentes e incongruentes: a utilização de vinhetas como método exploratório. RAM. Revista de Administração Mackenzie, v. 15, p. 42-68, 2014.

KRAUS, Sascha et al. In search for the ideal coopetition partner: an experimental study. Review of Managerial Science, v. 12, n. 4, p. 1025-1053, 2018.

KUSHNICK, Geoff. Access to resources shapes maternal decision-making evidence from a factorial vignette experiment. PloS one, v. 8, n. 9, p. e75539, 2013.

MARTIN, Kirsten; WALDMAN, Ari. Are Algorithmic Decisions Legitimate? The Effect of Process and Outcomes on Perceptions of Legitimacy of AI Decisions. Journal of Business Ethics, p. 1-18, 2022.

MEDER, Anthony A.; SCHWARTZ, Steven; YOUNG, Richard. Bandits and bounties: the intersection of information search and investment decisions. Accounting Research Journal, 2019.

MULLAINATHAN, S; THALER, R. Behavioral Economics. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, Working Paper No. 7948. 2000.

NEUMANN, Franziska; WULF, Torsten. Intercultural differences in issue interpretation: Effects of emotions and framing. European Management Journal, v. 40, n. 2, p. 182-193, 2022.

PARK, Camila Lee; NUNES, Mauro Fracarolli; ISHIZAKA, Alessio. End-to-end sustainability: trade-offs, consumers’ perceptions and decisions beyond B2C interfaces. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 2021

PATINO, Cecilia Maria; FERREIRA, Juliana Carvalho. Internal and external validity: can you apply research study results to your patients?. Jornal brasileiro de pneumologia, v. 44, p. 183-183, 2018.

RAMOS, Simone Cristina; TAKAHASHI, Adriana Roseli Wünsch; ROGLIO, Karina De Déa. Análise da produção nacional sobre processo decisório no período de 2004-2014. Contextus – Revista Contemporânea de Economia e Gestão, 2015.

ROSENTHAL, R. Covert communication in the psychological experiment. Psychological Bulletin, 67, p. 356-367, 1967

SANTANA, Weslei Gusmão Piau; GOMES, Almiralva Ferraz. processo decisório e racionalidade em redes de pequenas empresas: uma agenda para pesquisa. ENCONTRO DE ESTUDOS SOBRE EMPREENDEDORISMO E GESTÃO DE MICRO E PEQUENAS EMPRESAS, v. 5, 2008.

SBICCA, Adriana. Heurísticas no estudo das decisões econômicas: contribuições de Herbert Simon, Daniel Kahneman e Amos Tversky. Estudos Econômicos (São Paulo), v. 44, p. 579-603, 2014.

SIMON, Herbert A. Rational decision making in business organizations. The American economic review, v. 69, n. 4, p. 493-513, 1979.

SCHOENBERG, Nancy E.; RAVDAL, Hege. Using vignettes in awareness and attitudinal research. International journal of social research methodology, v. 3, n. 1, p. 63-74, 2000.

TAYLOR, Kelsey M.; HAJMOHAMMAD, Sara; VACHON, Stephan. Activist engagement and industry-level change: Adoption of new practices by observing firms. Industrial Marketing Management, v. 92, p. 295-306, 2021.

TETTEGAH, Sharon; BAILEY, Brian P.; TAYLOR, Kona. Clover: Narratives and simulations in virtual environments. The Journal of Negro Education, p. 43-56, 2007.

THALER, R. H.; SUNSTEIN, C. R. Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth and happiness. In: Amsterdam Law Forum. 2008.

THOMAS, Rodney et al. Decomposing social sustainability: Signaling theory insights into supplier selection decisions. Journal of Supply Chain Management, v. 57, n. 4, p. 117-136, 2021.

TORRACO, Richard J. Writing integrative literature reviews: Guidelines and examples. Human resource development review, v. 4, n. 3, p. 356-367, 2005.

TVERSKY, Amos; KAHNEMAN, Daniel. Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases: Biases in judgments reveal some heuristics of thinking under uncertainty. science, v. 185, n. 4157, p. 1124-1131, 1974.

TVERSKY, Amos; KAHNEMAN, Daniel. The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. In: Behavioral decision making. Springer, Boston, MA, 1985. p. 25-41.

VALENTINE, Sean; FLEISCHMAN, Gary. From schoolyard to workplace: The impact of bullying on sales and business employees' Machiavellianism, job satisfaction, and perceived importance of an ethical issue. Human Resource Management, v. 57, n. 1, p. 293-305, 2018.




Direitos autorais 2023 Ana Luiza Monteiro Bastos Ornellas, David Chester Carvalho Barros, Cleber Carvalho de Castro, Uajará Pessoa Araújo

Revista Capital Científico – Eletrônica (RCCe) Rua: Padre Salvador, 875 – Bairro Santa Cruz CEP: 85015-430  Guarapuava-Paraná-Brasil Campus Santa Cruz – Editora UNICENTRO ISSN  2177-4153 (Online)

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.